<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Little install woes</title>
	<link>http://www.marlyse.com/2005/04/28/little-install-woes/</link>
	<description>me, myself and my life</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 10:04:15 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.2</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: marlyse</title>
		<link>http://www.marlyse.com/2005/04/28/little-install-woes/#comment-290</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:18:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marlyse.com/2005/04/28/little-install-woes/#comment-290</guid>
					<description>ACTUALLY the comment things is WEIRD-er... more weird... than said just a moment ago. After posting I was able to SEE my 2 comments and it stated NO COMMENTS YET - and OFFICIALLY they where not yet added to the comments, I first had to APPROVE them (as I've set WordPress to moderated), and then the comment header changed to reflect the correct amount of comments posted.

I guess that in a way this is cool - people will think their comment as been posted... even if it's not. Or it is and only the title header changes? Then that would be stupid because why then should I moderate?

Let's see what comes out of it.

Basically I want to eliminate the moderation que. Else I guess I'll need to put a little blurb up to let people know what is going on.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ACTUALLY the comment things is WEIRD-er&#8230; more weird&#8230; than said just a moment ago. After posting I was able to SEE my 2 comments and it stated NO COMMENTS YET - and OFFICIALLY they where not yet added to the comments, I first had to APPROVE them (as I&#8217;ve set WordPress to moderated), and then the comment header changed to reflect the correct amount of comments posted.</p>
<p>I guess that in a way this is cool - people will think their comment as been posted&#8230; even if it&#8217;s not. Or it is and only the title header changes? Then that would be stupid because why then should I moderate?</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see what comes out of it.</p>
<p>Basically I want to eliminate the moderation que. Else I guess I&#8217;ll need to put a little blurb up to let people know what is going on.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: marlyse</title>
		<link>http://www.marlyse.com/2005/04/28/little-install-woes/#comment-289</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 19:01:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marlyse.com/2005/04/28/little-install-woes/#comment-289</guid>
					<description>Oops, just found something odd here on the page after adding the above comment: the line STILL reads NO COMMENTS YET - which is wrong... odd, older postings do show the right header info there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oops, just found something odd here on the page after adding the above comment: the line STILL reads NO COMMENTS YET - which is wrong&#8230; odd, older postings do show the right header info there.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: marlyse</title>
		<link>http://www.marlyse.com/2005/04/28/little-install-woes/#comment-288</link>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2005 18:59:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.marlyse.com/2005/04/28/little-install-woes/#comment-288</guid>
					<description>Meanwhile we've updated the FINK install which in turn DID recognize there was a later &lt;strong&gt;gettext&lt;/strong&gt; module, so now we have the version 0.10.19 installed which is the latest STABLE release of it. FINK took forever to update, but finally did - but still no go. Ran out of ideas at this point. The coder volunteered to check the stuff out on our server, which is really nice of him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Meanwhile we&#8217;ve updated the FINK install which in turn DID recognize there was a later <strong>gettext</strong> module, so now we have the version 0.10.19 installed which is the latest STABLE release of it. FINK took forever to update, but finally did - but still no go. Ran out of ideas at this point. The coder volunteered to check the stuff out on our server, which is really nice of him.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>
